![]() There's the normal one-writer/multiple-readers option, which it says is a "good general-purpose option for most workloads." It is! For the most part, this is going to be a more cost-effective method for hosting a database. Thankfully, AWS itself tells you what each use case is for on the new-database dialogue. They may be ready, but.the question, for anyone looking into changing their database setup, is whether serverless is better and cheaper than a dedicated server. MySQL has had the serverless option for longer than PostgreSQL, but both are now generally available to use and production ready. Serverless websites! Serverless APIs! Serverless.everything!Īmazon Web Services has their own serverless database offering, which is semi-new, semi-old, depending on the "compatibility version." This is how you have to use Amazon Aurora, AWS's database engine, which has both MySQL and PostgreSQL "compatible" flavors to get access to the serverless option. That’s what we’ll do in the next post, as well as separating our environments.Serverless is a borderline buzzword nowadays.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |